<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Complex Django hosting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joshourisman.com/2008/04/27/complex-django-hosting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joshourisman.com/2008/04/27/complex-django-hosting/</link>
	<description>An experiment in independence</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: imgrey</title>
		<link>http://www.joshourisman.com/2008/04/27/complex-django-hosting/#comment-73343</link>
		<dc:creator>imgrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joshourisman.com/2008/04/27/complex-django-hosting/#comment-73343</guid>
		<description>You should try http://bells-n-whistles.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should try <a href="http://bells-n-whistles.net" rel="nofollow">http://bells-n-whistles.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.joshourisman.com/2008/04/27/complex-django-hosting/#comment-46203</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joshourisman.com/2008/04/27/complex-django-hosting/#comment-46203</guid>
		<description>I'd say you can stay with WebFaction.
A friend of mine needed to support insane traffic for a month with his Django site and he got 12 shared accounts with them on different servers and one dedicated server with them for the database.
The traffic was load balanced between all the Django instances (one per each shared account) and they all talked to the database server.
It was a pretty cost-effective to handle that massive traffic and when the month was over he went back to a single shared account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say you can stay with WebFaction.<br />
A friend of mine needed to support insane traffic for a month with his Django site and he got 12 shared accounts with them on different servers and one dedicated server with them for the database.<br />
The traffic was load balanced between all the Django instances (one per each shared account) and they all talked to the database server.<br />
It was a pretty cost-effective to handle that massive traffic and when the month was over he went back to a single shared account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slicematt</title>
		<link>http://www.joshourisman.com/2008/04/27/complex-django-hosting/#comment-46174</link>
		<dc:creator>slicematt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joshourisman.com/2008/04/27/complex-django-hosting/#comment-46174</guid>
		<description>Thanks for considering us, please let me know if you have any questions. Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for considering us, please let me know if you have any questions. Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.303 seconds -->
